---
title: Does Steve Jobs Matter (to Apple Shareholders)?
description: creating a disciplined and fact-based process that leverages all of the growth avenues available
---

[![Semaphore - Private Equity funds-under-management and technology and market due diligence](https://prev.sema4usa.com/hs-fs/file-1633455679-jpg/Sema_4usa/Semaphore_Private_Equity_funds-under-management_technology_and_market_due_diligence_logo1.jpg)](http://www.sema4usa.com/)

[![Semaphore - Private Equity funds-under-management and technology and market due diligence](https://prev.sema4usa.com/hs-fs/file-1665728779-png/images/logo.png)](http://www.sema4usa.com/)

![Boston London New York](https://prev.sema4usa.com/hs-fs/file-15279406-gif/images/banner_boston_london_new-york.gif)

## [Does Steve Jobs Matter (to Apple Shareholders)?](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/bid/56785/Does-Steve-Jobs-Matter-to-Apple-Shareholders)

- [Tweet](https://twitter.com/share)

Next week, Apple will announce its first earnings since Steve Jobs stepped down from his role as CEO of Apple on January 15, 2011 due to health reasons. So far, the market has taken a wait and see attitude as to what it means for the company. After a relentless rise where the stock has more than tripled over the last 2 years, it has been trading in a narrow range for the last 2 months. The market is undoubtedly waiting for the next earnings report and the future guidance that comes with it to reassure them that Apple will be okay without him. Or, to confirm their fears that it won’t.

Often the market overreacts to news like this. In the end, one person rarely makes a critical difference in a company as large as Apple. But this case may be an exception. Read on to hear why…and what the implications are for other companies.

To understand Steve Jobs and his unique position, first, let’s consider the cases of some of the other technology visionaries. Starting a world-changing company is a very, very difficult feat and in our view, Bill Gates, Sergey Brin, Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, Michael Dell, Jeff Bezos and a few more deserve the billions that they have earned.

Yet, without diminishing their accomplishments in any way, greatness does not come from genius alone. In his book Outliers, Malcolm Gladwell makes a compelling case that timing is equally as critical to creating mega-success. Bill Gates was fortunate to have been ready when the PC was born, Jeff Bezos when the Internet first took off, and Sergey Brin and Larry Page as the Internet’s growth was making it too unwieldy for first generation search technologies to handle.

Strengthening Gladwell’s case is the fact that there are very, very few cases where companies, despite the presence of the same visionary founders, are able to replicate their initial success within an order of magnitude (or maybe even two orders).

Google is a great example. Google has probably tried harder than any other company to create new transformational innovations outside of its core business. Yet despite all the investment they’ve made in Google Mail, Google Docs, Google Books, Android, and countless other products, Google is still a one product company. Over 96% of their revenue in 2010 came from Internet advertising.  The only part of the business where they have achieved leadership outside of search is YouTube, which they bought.

Microsoft is a similar story. Practically all of the company’s success can still be tied to having DOS chosen as OS of the IBM PC. In 2010, the company earned over 73% of its operating profit from the sales of the Windows OS and Office Suite. If you include the contribution of the Backoffice tools (SQL Server, Sharepoint, Exchange, etc.), which could easily be considered extensions of the Windows Server OS, that percentage goes up to 93%. Everything else – Xbox, Windows Live, Bing, MSN, etc. – contributes just 7% of the operating profit.

This brings us back to Steve Jobs and Apple. What makes Steve Jobs truly unique is that he has done it more than once on a grand scale – In 1984 with the Mac, 1995 with Pixar, 2005 with iTunes, and 2007 with the iPhone.  My belief is that there are many individuals who can take what Steve Jobs has already created and take it forward. Assuming the company picks the right CEO to replace him, Apple should continue to soar on the strength of what Steve Jobs has already done. What is at risk is the next innovation that could take the company to new heights.

So what lesson should you take from Steve Jobs, Google, and Microsoft? The answer: Unless you have a Steve Jobs on your staff (not just a Bill Gates or Sergey Brin) you can't count on 'The Next Big Idea' to fuel your growth. Even if you do everything right, there is just too much uncertainty. Instead, what you should focus on is maximizing the opportunity you have. While Microsoft and Google may not have created a second transformational innovation, they made the most of the businesses they were in. They deeply understood their markets and competitors, strategically expanded into adjacent areas, made smart acquisitions, found new channels, expanded globally, and capitalized on new technologies.

In our Corporate Growth Planning practice, we work with executive teams on creating strategies to grow revenue 3x, 5x or more. While there are rarely shortages of good ideas, companies often struggle in sorting through and prioritizing them. In our experience, there seems to be a natural human reaction to pursue the 'Next Big Thing', especially in entrepreneurial companies. The real challenge is creating a disciplined and fact-based process that leverages all of the growth avenues available, not just the brightest shiniest objects.

*This article was contributed by Jon Klein. Jon is the founder and general partner of The Topline Strategy Group, a strategy consulting and market research firm specializing in emerging technologies. Jon brings a unique blend of strategy consulting and hands on operating experience to The Topline Strategy Group and works closely with Semaphore on a variety of engagements.*

 Topics: [due diligence](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/due-diligence), [technology](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/technology), [market diligence](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/market-diligence), [Corporate Growth Planning](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/corporate-growth-planning)

### Subscribe by Email

### Most Popular Posts

### Browse by Tag

- [American entrepreneurism (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/american-entrepreneurism)
- [analysis (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/analysis)
- [Announcements (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/announcements)
- [Biotech (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/biotech)
- [BOSS (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/boss)
- [business (5)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/business)
- [business advisory (4)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/business-advisory)
- [Business Operations (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/business-operations)
- [Corporate Growth Planning (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/corporate-growth-planning)
- [diligence (13)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/diligence)
- [due diligence (12)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/due-diligence)
- [entrepreneurs (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/entrepreneurs)
- [equity (10)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/equity)
- [ethical standards (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/ethical-standards)
- [ethics (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/ethics)
- [finance advice (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/finance-advice)
- [funds under management (6)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/funds-under-management)
- [general partners (14)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/general-partners)
- [growth equity investments (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/growth-equity-investments)
- [ILPA (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/ilpa)
- [ILPA Principles (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/ilpa-principles)
- [investment (11)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/investment)
- [Life Sciences (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/life-sciences)
- [limited partners (14)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/limited-partners)
- [LP (5)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/lp)
- [market (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/market)
- [market diligence (11)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/market-diligence)
- [market diligence; law firms; (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/market-diligence-law-firms)
- [new markets tax credits (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/new-markets-tax-credits)
- [Olympics (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/olympics)
- [operations (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/operations)
- [Pipeline Interviews (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/pipeline-interviews)
- [portfolio company (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/portfolio-company)
- [private equity (6)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/private-equity)
- [private equity funds (16)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/private-equity-funds)
- [SBIR (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/sbir)
- [Semaphore (22)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/semaphore)
- [small businesses (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/small-businesses)
- [Strategy Services (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/strategy-services)
- [Survey (10)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/survey)
- [technology (12)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/technology)
- [Technology Assessment (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/technology-assessment)
- [technology diligence (7)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/technology-diligence)
- [troubled funds (12)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/troubled-funds)
- [turnaround (4)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/turnaround)
- [valley of death (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/valley-of-death)
- [VC (7)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/vc)
- [Venture Capital (17)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/venture-capital)
- [venture funds (9)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/topic/venture-funds)

### Posts by Month

- [June 2010 (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2010/06)
- [April 2011 (3)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2011/04)
- [November 2009 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2009/11)
- [December 2009 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2009/12)
- [January 2010 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2010/01)
- [February 2010 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2010/02)
- [July 2010 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2010/07)
- [September 2010 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2010/09)
- [October 2010 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2010/10)
- [December 2013 (2)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2013/12)
- [March 2010 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2010/03)
- [January 2011 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2011/01)
- [March 2011 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2011/03)
- [September 2011 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2011/09)
- [October 2011 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2011/10)
- [December 2011 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2011/12)
- [February 2012 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2012/02)
- [July 2012 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2012/07)
- [November 2012 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2012/11)
- [January 2013 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2013/01)
- [April 2013 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2013/04)
- [May 2013 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2013/05)
- [July 2013 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2013/07)
- [February 2014 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2014/02)
- [August 2014 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2014/08)
- [December 2014 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2014/12)
- [February 2015 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2015/02)
- [August 2015 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2015/08)
- [January 2016 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2016/01)
- [February 2016 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2016/02)
- [August 2016 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2016/08)
- [January 2017 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2017/01)
- [February 2017 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2017/02)
- [August 2017 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2017/08)
- [January 2018 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2018/01)
- [February 2018 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2018/02)
- [February 2019 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2019/02)
- [February 2020 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2020/02)
- [February 2021 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2021/02)
- [January 2022 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2022/01)
- [February 2022 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2022/02)
- [February 2023 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2023/02)
- [February 2024 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2024/02)
- [February 2025 (1)](https://prev.sema4usa.com/blog/archive/2025/02)

- [Home ](http://www.sema4usa.com/)|
- [Services ](http://www.sema4usa.com/Technology-Diligence-and-Funds-Under-Management-Services/)|
- [About Us ](http://www.sema4usa.com/About-our-Funds-Under-Management-and-Technology-and-Market-Due-Diligence/)|
- [Semaphore Client List ](http://www.sema4usa.com/semaphore-client-list/)|
- [Blog ](http://www.sema4usa.com/blog/)|
- [Contact Semaphore ](http://www.sema4usa.com/contact-semaphore/)|
- [Semaphore Connections ](http://www.sema4usa.com/semaphore-connections/)

© 2020 Semaphore. All rights reserved.